Pengaruh Motivasi, Stress Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Fisik Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada Balai Penyelidikan dan Pengembangan Teknologi Kebencanaan Geologi (BPPTKG) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine and evaluate the effect of motivation, work stress, and physical work environment on employee performance at the Center for Research and Development of Geological Disaster Technology (BPPTKG) Special Region of Yogyakarta. The sample in this study were employees of the Special Region of Yogyakarta Special Region of Yogyakarta with 70 respondents. The sampling technique applied is non-probability sampling where all members of the population are sampled. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires. The data analysis method used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis which aims to calculate the magnitude of the regression coefficient to show the magnitude of the influence of motivation, work stress and physical work environment on employee performance. While the observation test shows that various changes in motivation, work stress and physical work environment jointly affect employee performance in the special area of the Geological Disaster Technology Investigation and Development Agency (BPPTKG) Special Region of Yogyakarta. The results of this research show that: (1) motivation has no significant effect on employee performance; (2) work stress has no significant effect on employee performance; (3) the physical work environment has a significant effect on employee performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it