Toponymy of Bandung City in Mancapat Perspective (Quarter Typology)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, the community and the government tend to rename a location without recognizing its historical significance when, in fact, the naming of a place reflects a national identity, and in some areas, it incorporates mitigating elements, including the city of Bandung. For this reason, this study was conducted to discover the origins of place names in the city of Bandung with historical and other meanings to ensure that they will be taken into account by all parties when naming or renaming places/areas in Bandung. That being the case, a historical method with a toponomatology approach (toponymy) and the concept of mancapat (quarter typology) were employed in this study, resulting in a toponymy for the city of Bandung based on a naming pattern that refers to the concept of traditional urban planning (mancapat/circular pattern) which is in line with its historical meanings, with a time frame between 1810-2000. This is distinct from the patterns or concepts researchers adopt, typically referring to natural or socio-cultural phenomena (linear patterns). Therefore, the findings of this study can offer new insights into tracing the origins of specific locations through historical analysis supported by the concept of traditional Javanese planology (mancapat) or quarter typology. Thus, toponymy researchers can adopt it for other traditional inland state cities in Indonesia. Saat ini terdapat kecenderungan masyarakat juga pemerintah mengganti nama sebuah tempat tanpa mempertimbangkan segi kesejarahannya. Padahal, penamaan tempat tersebut menunjukkan sebuah jati diri bangsa, bahkan untuk beberapa daerah mengandung unsur mitigasi, termasuk di dalamnya wilayah Kota Bandung. Oleh karena itu, kajian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan asal-usul nama tempat di Kota Bandung yang memiliki makna sejarah dan makna lainnya, agar menjadi pertimbangan para pihak saat akan mengganti atau memberi nama tempat/kawasan di Kota Bandung. Untuk itu, metode sejarah dengan pendekatan Toponomatology (Toponimi) dan konsep Mancapat (Typology Kuarter ) digunakan di dalam penelitian ini, sehingga dihasilkan Toponimi Kota Bandung berdasar pola penamaan yang mengacu kepada konsep tata kota tradisional (mancapat/pola sirkular) yang in line dengan makna kesejarahannya, dengan bingkai waktu antara 1810-2000. Hal ini berbeda dari pola atau konsep yang selama ini digunakan para peneliti yang pada umumnya mengacu kepada fenomena alam atau sosio kultural (pola linear). Dengan demikian, hasil penelitian ini dapat memberikan khazanah yang baru di dalam mengungkapkan asal-usul tempat, yakni analisis historis yang dibantu konsep planologi (tata kota) tradisional di Jawa (Mancapat) atau Typology Kuarter. Maka, para peneliti toponimi bisa mengadopsinya untuk kota-kota tradisional pedalaman (inland state) lainnya di Nusantara.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".