Signal-Vehicle Coordination Control Modeling and Roadside Unit Deployment Evaluation under V2I Communication Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Signal-vehicle coordinated control holds substantial promise for enhancing urban transportation efficiency. However, its development faces notable challenges: (1) most existing studies have been conducted based on the assumption of perfect communication conditions. This assumption overlooks the significant impact of vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication quality on control performance, which leads to poor applicability in practice. (2) The evaluation of roadside unit (RSU) deployment for optimizing signal-vehicle control has not been well studied. Hence, the modeling of signal-vehicle coordination control and RSU deployment evaluation under V2I environment are studied in this paper. First, we introduce a communication model that characterizes the imperfections in communication between RSUs and connected vehicles (CVs). Second, we propose a model for signal-vehicle coordination control within this connected environment. This model integrates strategies from both signal control optimization and the speed optimization of CV platoons. Finally, to assess the impact of the RSU deployment parameters on the performance of signal-vehicle coordination control, we introduce a systematic evaluation method. The reduction in vehicle delays is introduced as the evaluation indicator for control performance. Six other indicators—the number of vehicles in the RSU communication domain, connectivity probability between the CV and RSU, number of vehicles whose speeds are successfully optimized, number of speed adjustments, green extension time, and overlap rate of the communication domains of multiple RSUs—are introduced as the observation indicators. The simulation experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed model in implementing signal-vehicle coordination control under imperfect communication and environments in low-traffic, medium-traffic, and high-traffic scenarios. Furthermore, these experiments show the quantitative impact of RSU deployment parameters (communication distance, command transmission cycle, installation position, and number of RSUs) on control performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".