MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387701494 · doi:10.1101/2023.10.13.562290

Effects of intensified training with insufficient recovery on joint level and single muscle fibre mechanical function: The role of myofibrillar Ca <sup>2+</sup> sensitivity

2023· preprint· en· W4387701494 on OpenAlexafffund
Olivia P. Roussel, Christopher Pignanelli, Emma F. Hubbard, Alexandra M. Coates, Arthur J. Cheng, Jamie F. Burr, Geoffrey A. Power

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMyofibrilMedicineVastus lateralis muscleChemistryQuadriceps muscleInternal medicineCardiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSkeletal muscle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Intense exercise training with insufficient recovery is associated with reductions in neuromuscular performance. However, it is unclear how single muscle fibre mechanical function and myofibrillar Ca 2+ sensitivity contribute to these impairments. We investigated the effects of overload training on joint-level neuromuscular performance and cellular-level mechanical function. Fourteen athletes (4 female, 10 male) underwent a 3-week intensified training protocol consisting of ∼140% of their regular training hours with three additional high-intensity training sessions per week. Neuromuscular performance of the knee extensors was assessed via maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force, electrically evoked twitch contractions, and a force-frequency relationship. Muscle biopsies were taken from the vastus lateralis to assess single fibre mechanical function. Neither MVC force nor twitch parameters were altered following intensified training (all p> 0.05), but a rightward shift in the force-frequency curve was observed with a 6-27% reduction in force at low-frequencies (5-20Hz, all p< 0.05). In single fibres, maximal force output was not reduced following intensified training, but there was a rightward shift in the force-pCa curve driven by a 6% reduction in Ca 2+ sensitivity as indicated by a lower pCa 50 value (i.e., higher [Ca 2+ ]) across fibre types (Pre=6.477±0.157, Post=6.088±0.480, p<0.05 ). These data indicate intensified training leads to impaired Ca 2+ sensitivity at the single fibre level, which in part explains impaired neuromuscular function at the joint level during lower frequencies of activation. This is an important consideration for athletes, as performance is often assessed at maximal levels of activation, and these underlying impairments in force generation may be less obvious. New & Noteworthy Intense exercise training with insufficient recovery leads to impaired muscle contractile performance. These impairments often manifest at lower frequencies of muscle stimulation, termed prolonged low-frequency force depression. Impaired myofibrillar calcium sensitivity has been suggested as a potential mechanism of prolonged low-frequency force depression. Our work shows that impaired calcium sensitivity of single muscle fibres coincided with joint level prolonged low-frequency force depression after intense exercise training with insufficient recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→