Joint classification and segmentation for an interpretable diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome from chest x-rays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition that can cause a dramatic drop in blood oxygen levels due to widespread lung inflammation. Chest radiography is widely used as a primary modality to detect ARDS due to its crucial role in diagnosing the syndrome, and the x-ray images can be obtained promptly. However, despite the extensive literature on chest x-ray (CXR) image analysis, there is limited research on ARDS diagnosis due to the scarcity of ARDS-labeled datasets. Additionally, many machine learning-based approaches result in high performance in pulmonary disease diagnosis, but their decisions are often not easily interpretable, which can hinder their clinical acceptance. This work aims to develop a method for detecting signs of ARDS in CXR images that can be clinically interpretable. Approach: To achieve this goal, an ARDS-labeled dataset of chest radiography images is gathered and annotated for training and evaluation of the proposed approach. The proposed deep classification-segmentation model, Dense-Ynet, provides an interpretable framework for automatically diagnosing ARDS in CXR images. The model takes advantage of lung segmentation in diagnosing ARDS. By definition, ARDS causes bilateral diffuse infiltrates throughout the lungs. To consider the local involvement of lung areas, each lung is divided into upper and lower halves, and our model classifies the resulting lung quadrants. Results: The quadrant-based classification strategy yields the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 95.1% (95% CI 93.5 to 96.1), which allows for providing a reference for the model's predictions. In terms of segmentation, the model accurately identifies lung regions in CXR images even when lung boundaries are unclear in abnormal images. Conclusions: This study provides an interpretable decision system for diagnosing ARDS, by following the definition used by clinicians for the diagnosis of ARDS from CXR images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it