MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387705767 · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.10.5.054504

Joint classification and segmentation for an interpretable diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome from chest x-rays

2023· article· en· W4387705767 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Yahyatabar, Philippe Jouvet, Farida Chériet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéInstitut de Valorisation des Données
KeywordsARDSMedicineAcute respiratory distressRadiologyRadiographyLungChest radiographInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition that can cause a dramatic drop in blood oxygen levels due to widespread lung inflammation. Chest radiography is widely used as a primary modality to detect ARDS due to its crucial role in diagnosing the syndrome, and the x-ray images can be obtained promptly. However, despite the extensive literature on chest x-ray (CXR) image analysis, there is limited research on ARDS diagnosis due to the scarcity of ARDS-labeled datasets. Additionally, many machine learning-based approaches result in high performance in pulmonary disease diagnosis, but their decisions are often not easily interpretable, which can hinder their clinical acceptance. This work aims to develop a method for detecting signs of ARDS in CXR images that can be clinically interpretable. Approach: To achieve this goal, an ARDS-labeled dataset of chest radiography images is gathered and annotated for training and evaluation of the proposed approach. The proposed deep classification-segmentation model, Dense-Ynet, provides an interpretable framework for automatically diagnosing ARDS in CXR images. The model takes advantage of lung segmentation in diagnosing ARDS. By definition, ARDS causes bilateral diffuse infiltrates throughout the lungs. To consider the local involvement of lung areas, each lung is divided into upper and lower halves, and our model classifies the resulting lung quadrants. Results: The quadrant-based classification strategy yields the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 95.1% (95% CI 93.5 to 96.1), which allows for providing a reference for the model's predictions. In terms of segmentation, the model accurately identifies lung regions in CXR images even when lung boundaries are unclear in abnormal images. Conclusions: This study provides an interpretable decision system for diagnosing ARDS, by following the definition used by clinicians for the diagnosis of ARDS from CXR images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical ImagingSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207