Mesure de la charge virale VIH : connaissances, attitudes et pratiques des agents de santé, Burkina Faso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Approximately a quarter of people living with HIV (PLHIV) had their plasma viral load (PVL) measured in 2020 in Burkina Faso. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of health workers regarding HIV PVL measurement. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among health workers involved in the care of PLHIV in the 13 regions of Burkina Faso in 2021. Scores were constructed to assess their KAP on PVL measurement. Factors associated with knowledge and practices were identified by logistic regression. Results: A total of 255 health workers were surveyed. The majority had good knowledge (73%) and favorable attitudes (93%). However, 40% had inadequate practices. Taking into account the availability of a laboratory to carry out PVL tests within the health center, having a coordinating role increased the likelihood of having good knowledge, while not having a medical qualification reduced this likelihood. Good practices were more common among health workers working at the second level of the health pyramid. Conclusions: Interventions to increase the demand for a measurement of PVL are essential to improve the care of PLHIV. For example, future investigations could explore the role of mediators in increasing the demand for PVL among PLHIV and their caregivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".