MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387717672 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2023.3323042

A 0.1–20.1-GHz Wideband Noise-Canceling g<sub>m</sub>-Boosted CMOS LNA With Gain-Reuse

2023· article· en· W4387717672 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Amin Karami, Martin Lee, Rashid Mirzavand, Kambiz Moez

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandLow-noise amplifierCMOSNotationAmplifierMathematicsAlgorithmElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a novel wideband low-noise amplifier (LNA) topology that incorporates noise cancellation in a$g_m$-boosted common gate (CG) LNA by reusing the inverting amplifier used for$g_m$-boosting as a parallel gain stage A$g_m$-boosted CG stage provides the wideband input matching while the current reuse (CR) inverting amplifier is simultaneously used for boosting$g_m$, improving gain, and canceling noise. Shunt and series inductive peaking techniques are implemented to extend the bandwidth of the LNA. The LNA is fabricated in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) 65-nm CMOS process and occupies a die area of 0.263 mm2. The measurement results indicate the combination of these techniques produces an LNA with a 20-GHz bandwidth, an average gain of 12 dB, an average noise figure (NF) of 3.87 dB, and a 2.53-dBm peak input-referred third-order intercept point (IIP3) while consuming 13.2 mW at 1.2 V, resulting in the highest figure of merit (FoM) among the reported state-of-the-art LNAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207