MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387730319 · doi:10.2337/cd23-0058

When Type 1 Diabetes Meets Dementia: Practical Strategies to Help Patients and Their Loved Ones

2023· article· en· W4387730319 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ian Blumer, Medha Munshi, William H. Polonsky

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Diabetes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsCitationIconLibrary scienceType 2 diabetesMedicineGerontologyDiabetes mellitusComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Practical Pointers| October 18 2023 When Type 1 Diabetes Meets Dementia: Practical Strategies to Help Patients and Their Loved Ones Ian R. Blumer 0000-0002-0451-678X ; Ian R. Blumer 1University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Corresponding author: Ian R. Blumer, ian@ianblumer.com Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Medha N. Munshi 0000-0001-6917-4197 ; Medha N. Munshi 2Joslin Geriatric Diabetes Programs, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA3Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar William H. Polonsky 0000-0001-9064-6144 William H. Polonsky 4Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA5University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Corresponding author: Ian R. Blumer, ian@ianblumer.com Clin Diabetes cd230058 https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0058 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Citation Ian R. Blumer, Medha N. Munshi, William H. Polonsky; When Type 1 Diabetes Meets Dementia: Practical Strategies to Help Patients and Their Loved Ones. Clin Diabetes 2023; cd230058. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0058 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsClinical Diabetes Search Advanced Search This content is only available via PDF. ©2023 by the American Diabetes Association2023Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license. Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical DiabetesSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207