MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S1206 Rapid Symptomatic Relief Is Correlated with Early Endoscopic Response to the Nucleotide-Binding Oligomerization Domain, Leucine Rich Repeat Containing X1 (Nlrx1) Agonist Nx-13 in Ulcerative Colitis in a Phase 1b Study

2023· article· en· W4387733161 on OpenAlexaff
Andrés Yarur, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Remo Panaccione, Marla C. Dubinsky, Simon Lichtiger, Rebecca Mosig, Fabio Cataldi, Stefan Schreiber

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyPlaceboInternal medicineUlcerative colitisPrednisoneClinical trialSurgeryPathologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: NLRX1 is an immunometabolic mitochondrial protein whose activation reduces oxidative stress to decrease inflammation. NX-13 is a novel, first-in-class, orally active and gut selective NLRX1 agonist with low systemic exposure. In animal studies of IBD, NX-13 reduced inflammatory responses and overall disease severity. A phase 1a study showed NX-13 to be well tolerated. The aim of this analysis was to assess the association between the onset of clinical improvement with early endoscopic response after the 4 weeks of NX-13 treatment. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 36 patients with active UC (Total Mayo Score 4-10; Mayo Endoscopic Subscore [MES] 2-3) were randomized to receive NX-13 250mg Immediate Release (IR), 500mg IR, 500mg Delayed Release (DR) or Placebo QD for 4 weeks. Stable 5-ASAs and corticosteroids (oral ≤20mg/day prednisone or equivalent) were permitted. Stool Frequency (SFS) and Rectal Bleeding Scores (RBS) were collected at baseline, week 2 and week 4. MES was centrally read in a blinded manner at screening and week 4. A blinded pathologist performed Geboes scoring. Results: Symptom Improvement, Endoscopic Response, Endoscopic Remission, and Histologic Remission rates were calculated and are defined in Table 1. No placebo patients achieved Endoscopic Response. More than half of NX-13 dosed patients with Symptom Improvement at week 2 progressed to achieve rapid Endoscopic Response after only 4 weeks, with 26% in complete Endoscopic Remission in this short trial (Table 1). Histologic Remission was also more common in patients with Symptom Improvement. Sub analysis of the Symptom Improvement group highlighted patients with early, isolated SFS improvement (n=4) had the greatest rates of Endoscopic Response (100%), Endoscopic Remission (75%), and Histologic Remission (75%) (Figure 1). Patients with RBS Improvements also responded endoscopically and histologically better than patients without symptom improvement. Conversely, nearly all Endoscopic Responders showed early Symptom Improvement (10/11) at week 2. Further, all 5 of the Endoscopic Remitters had symptomatic improvement at week 2. Conclusion: Patients with active UC starting treatment with NX-13 that achieved fast onset of Symptom Improvement were more likely to achieve associated rapid Endoscopic Response and Remission. This novel MOA with good safety paired with promising efficacy results will be further evaluated in a proof-of-concept study (NCT05785715).Figure 1.: Endoscopic Outcomes at week 4 were Correlated with Symptom Improvement by week 2. Table 1. - Endoscopic Definitions and Outcomes at Week 4 of NX-13 treatment by presence or absence of early Symptom Improvement at Week 2 Outcome Definition Time Point Symptom Improvement at Week 2 No Symptom Improvement◊ (n=13) All Symptom Improvement◊ (n=19) RBS Symptom Improvement◊ (n=10) SFS Symptom Improvement◊ (n=4) RBS+SFS Symptom Improvement◊ (n=5) Endoscopic Response Change from Baseline (CFB) MES of < 0 Week 4 1 (7.6%) 10 (52.6%)¤ 4 (40%) 4 (100%)* 2 (40%) Endoscopic Remission Mayo Endoscopic Score = 0 Week 4 0 (0%) 5 (26.3%)¤ 2 (20%) 3 (75%)* 0 (0%) Histologic Remission Geboes score ≤3.1, no increase in neutrophils in the Lamina Propria Week 4 3 (23.1%) 8 (42.1%) 4 (40%) 3 (75%) 1 (20%) ◊No Symptom Improvement (SI) defined as RBS and SFS CFB ≥0; All SI defined as RBS or SFS CFB < 0; RBS SI defined as RBS CFB of < 0, SFS CFB ≥0; SFS SI defined as SFS CFB of < 0, RBS CFB ≥0; RBS+SFS SI defined as CFB of < 0 in RBS AND SFS; *χ2 p≤0.05; ¤χ2 p≤0.10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→