MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S604 Outpatient Flexible Endoscopic Diverticulotomy for Management of Zenker’s Diverticulum – A Retrospective Observational Study From Single Center

2023· article· en· W4387733774 on OpenAlexaffabout
Harjot Bedi, Avni Jain, Fergal Donnellan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDysphagiaZenker's diverticulumRetrospective cohort studySurgeryEndoscopySwallowingDiverticulum (mollusc)Interquartile rangeOutpatient clinicInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) is an acquired condition that develops due to abnormally high pressures during swallowing, leading to outpouching of mucosa and submucosa within the pharyngoesophageal junction. In those presenting with dysphagia, regurgitation, halitosis, or weight loss, ZD can be diagnosed with barium swallow or endoscopy. Flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy is an established procedure for ZD. The aim of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of outpatient flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy for ZD. Methods: All patients who had a flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) between April 1, 2012 and May 31, 2023 were included. Retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain patient demographic and procedural and post-procedural management data. Any complications during and after the procedure were included. Results: 38 patients were included with 46 flexible endoscopic diverticulotomies performed. 24 patients (63.2%) were male, and median age was 78.5 (range 51 to 103) at the time of procedure. Majority of patients (73.7%) had a Charlson Comorbidity score of 3 or higher. Only 1 patient was an active smoker, and none had excessive alcohol use history. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and heart burn were most common symptoms present at the time of referral (91.3%, 71.7%, and 58.7%, respectively). 10 (21.7%) had previous interventions for ZD – 8 of which were with flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy. 12 procedures (26.1%) were performed under conscious sedation and 34 (73.9%) under general anesthetic. 5 patients (10.9%) had intraprocedural bleeding, that did not require transfusions. 3 patients (6.8%) developed subcutaneous emphysema within 2 hours post-procedure, and were managed conservatively without further endoscopic or surgical intervention. 33 patients (71.7%) were discharged on the same day of procedure, with an additional 6 (13.0%) discharged within 2 days post-procedure. Median follow-up was 74 days (range 0-2472 days). Conclusion: Endoscopic flexible diverticulotomy is a safe procedure for the management of Zenker’s Diverticula. Patients with immediate complications, including intraprocedural bleeding or presence of subcutaneous emphysema within 2 hours post-procedure, were associated with hospital stay longer than 1 day. None of the patients developed late complications or required readmission within 30 days of discharge. Therefore, outpatient ZD management is effective in both patient management and resource allocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207