MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S1562 Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2023· review· en· W4387733923 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Zhu, Rohan Kakkar, Daljeet Chahal, Eric M. Yoshida, Trana Hussaini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineSemaglutideMeta-analysisNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseFatty liverSteatosisOdds ratioGastroenterologySteatohepatitisConfidence intervalPlaceboRandomized controlled trialLiraglutideDiseaseType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusPathologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease, with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 32.4%. Unfortunately, to date, there are no approved pharmacotherapies for NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with NAFLD. Methods: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase were searched from inception to May 1, 2023, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model expressing continuous outcomes as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD), and dichotomous outcomes as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistic. Results: Three RCTs involving 458 patients with NAFLD were included. Semaglutide improved histological outcomes compared to placebo, with significantly higher likelihood of NASH resolution (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.70 to 5.95, I2=0%), improvement in steatosis (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.71, I2=57%), lobular inflammation (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.96, I2=0%), and hepatocellular ballooning (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.83 to 4.65, I2=0%), but not fibrosis stage (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.15 to 3.41, I2=80%). Radiologically, semaglutide significantly reduced liver stiffness (SMD -0.48, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.11, I2=57%) and steatosis (MD -4.96%, 95% CI -9.92 to 0.01, I2=64%). It also significantly reduced ALT (MD -14.06 U/L, 95% CI -22.06 to -6.07, I2=0%) and AST (MD -11.44 U/L, 95% CI -17.23 to -5.65, I2=0%). Patients treated with semaglutide had improved cardiometabolic outcomes, including greater decreases in HgA1c (MD -0.77%, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.37, I 2=75%) and weight loss (MD -6.53 kg, 95% CI -11.21 to -1.85, I2=0%) compared to the placebo. However, semaglutide was associated with higher occurrence of GI-related side effects (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.68 to 8.23, I2=49%), but the overall risk of serious adverse events was comparable between the 2 groups (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.62, I2=0%). Conclusion: Semaglutide demonstrated significant improvements in NASH resolution and NAFLD Activity Score components, but not in fibrosis stage. Furthermore, semaglutide resulted in radiologic improvements in liver stiffness and steatosis, liver enzymes, and cardiometabolic outcomes while maintaining a well-tolerated safety profile. Further trials of longer duration are needed to investigate its efficacy in fibrosis regression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.029
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→