MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387741322 · doi:10.2514/6.2023-4792

A Magnetopause Model for Sizing Artificial Magnetospheres at Mars and Lagrange-1 Orbits

2023· article· en· W4387741322 on OpenAlexaff
Scott A. Carpenter, Matthew Qi, R. X. Xie, W. M. Tang, Sophia Hu, Cherry Chen, N. Yao, Nicholas Chao, Alexander Lu, S. Mao, Seabert Mao, Ranya Zhang, Kris Luo, Edrea Jiang, Katherine Lu, David Zhao, Jesse Yao, Johnry Zhao, Daniel Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsMaRS
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetopauseMars Exploration ProgramUranusPhysicsSolar windMartianAstrobiologyPlanetNeptuneGeophysicsAstronomyMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our prior work showed that a Martian equatorial surface or near subsurface high-temperature superconducting ring (HTS ring) could generate a global magnetic field that provides two main atmosphere-protecting phenomena: (1) to form a paraboloidal artificial magnetopause (MP) to act as a shield against solar wind particles, and (2) to act as a cage to sputtered and photoionized upper-atmospheric particles. Such HTS rings to hard-surface solar bodies, but not to free-floating HTS rings at Lagrange orbits and elsewhere. Lagrange 1 (L1) semi-stable orbits are distant from their co orbiting parent planets. For example, the Sol-Mars L1 co-orbit is ~318.74 marsRii (1,082,484 km) distant to Mars. Consequently, a HTS ring at the Sol-Mars L1 orbit might not keep Mars within its long magnetospheric tail for three main reasons: (1) Sol’s own heliospheric magnetic field would treat the L1 HTS ring as a compass needle under magnetic torque; (2) turbulent solar-wind buffeting of the magnetotail; and (3) the lack of a local Martian magnetic ‘cage’ field to retain sputtered and photoionized upper atmospheric ions. This new work describes the rationale and development of the Portable MP Model that is simple, intuitive, analytical, and portable to five classes of planetary-scale magnetic dipole moments: (1) natural dynamo solar bodies (Mercury, Earth, Jupiter, Ganymede, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune), (2) solar bodies that are given surface or near-subsurface HTS rings (such as proposed for Mars), (3) L1-orbit HTS rings (such as proposed for the Sol-Mars L1 co orbit), (4) HTS-ringed space stations and space ships, and (5) HTS-ringed free floating astronauts. The Portable MP Model also accurately computes the MP-standoff distance (\mathbit{r}_{\mathbit{mp}}) in the nearfield of human-engineered rings (as proposed for Mars). Additionally, being primarily a magnetic model, the Portable MP Model can look into dipole-dominant planetary interiors to compute ‘best-fit’ dynamo-layer ring size and amperage magnitude—we report on the ‘best-fit’ dynamo-layer rings for Mercury and Earth. The simplicity of the new Portable MP Model makes it intuitive and educational, opening research into the engineering and application of magnetopauses to a wide audience: space-science and engineering professionals, math and science students from sixth grade to university graduate level, and the industrious public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207