Aerobic biotransformation of <i>Sargassum fluitans</i> in combination with sheep manure: optimization of control variables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sargassum fluitans was composted alongside sheep manure, in a transformative process that significantly enhanced the algal material’s properties. Post the screening/washing/screening pretreatment, the content of total volatile solids escalated to 73.20%, while ash content reduced to 16.45%. Concurrently, lignin values surged to 30.12% as the biodegradability factor declined to 21%. The pretreatment decreased electrical conductivity from 11.60 to 1.32 DS/m. Employing a central composite design and response surface analysis pinpointed the optimal substrate combinations for carbon/nitrogen ratios of 35:1 and 25:1. The chosen combinations presented a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.9589, carbon/nitrogen ratio; R2 = 0.6584, pH), indicative of a robust statistical fit. Over a 45-day period, composting was conducted using bioreactors or biopiles, maintaining near-neutral pH values and temperatures slightly above ambient levels. The composting process reduced up to 94% of fecal coliforms in the 1:1 combination. Physicochemical analyses confirmed that the final product is a valuable compost-soil improver, with great potential for usage in organic agriculture, reforestation, and urban green spaces. Hence, this research underscores composting as an efficient technique in managing organic waste, including the emergent and seasonal Sargassum fluitans, thus addressing a pressing environmental concern with an innovative, effective solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".