S3159 Development of Diffuse Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Submucosal Petechiae and Haemorrhage in a Patient With Newly Diagnosed Primary Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Symptom-producing GI bleed due to primary immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) remains highly uncommon, and patients' hypocoagulability pose challenge for endoscopic interventions. Case Description/Methods: A 47-year-old woman with a distant history of severe dyspepsia and gastritis was admitted with 14-hour history of oral, nasal and ocular mucosal bleeding, superficial petechiae, and a platelet count of 5 × 109/L. The patient was started on IV examethasone and immunoglobulin in light of platelet decline to < 3 × 109/L. On post-admission day (PAD) 3, the patient had increasing melena, down-trending Hgb at 107 g/L, and a Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score of 4. Coincidentally, the patient’s same-day platelet level mildly rebounded to 24 × 109/L, presenting a window for endoscopy. EGD with biopsy found diffuse hypopharynx and gastric submucosa petechiae and hemorrhage without active bleeding. H. pylori was negative. The patient was discharged home on PAD 5, however was re-admitted a week later due to SARS-COVID-2 infection and relapsing ITP with a platelet level of 16 × 109 /L. No GI bleed recurred. Discussion: Weighing the risks and benefits of interventions in ITP remain difficult due to limited evidence. The 2012 ASGE guideline has not established a safe platelet threshold for upper GI endoscopy with biopsy, but the commonly understood value of 0.05 × 109/L can easily be approached in ITP. In ITP patients with GI bleed unsuitable for endoscopic and did not meet transfusion threshold, IV bevacizumab could be attempted for its evidence in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia GI bleed. In ITP patients with GI bleed suitable for endoscopy, technique selection depends upon endoscopic findings. Although a Canadian RCT found neither argon plasma coagulation (APC) nor hamoclipping to be superior for high-risk ulcers, the former were more likely to fail in ITP. MDACC expert opinions suggested against cautery in thrombocytopenia due to risk for iatrogenic ulcers. A 2015 systematic review found 1 out of 3 attempted electric cautery for haemostasis was unsuccessful and required surgery in thrombocytopenia, while five out of seven attempts with fibrin glue were successful. A survey of patients with advanced cancer requiring GI haemostasis revealed a re-bleeding rate of 30% with both haemostasis powder or APC. In cases of refractory bleeding, radiofrequency ablation could be attempted given its recent validation as a safe and effective treatment for refractory gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) (Figure 1).Figure 1.: Diffuse sub-mucosal haemorrhage and petechiae of the gastric body as seen during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".