S2919 A Twelve-Year Follow-Up of Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Cronkhite Canada Syndrome (CCS) is a rare gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by diffuse non-neoplastic polyposis of the GI tract with ectodermal associated changes such as onychomadesis, alopecia, and cutaneous hyperpigmentation. The initial manifestation mimics protein-losing enteropathy, presenting with diarrhea, abdominal pain, malnutrition, hypoalbuminemia, and weight loss. The disease seems to follow a nonhereditary and sporadic path, with a possible autoimmune component. Diagnosis involves a combined clinical picture with endoscopic and histopathologic evidence. The mainstay of treatment includes corticosteroids, steroid-sparing agents, antihistamine therapy, and antibiotic. The prognosis is poor, with a 5-year mortality rate of about 55%. Here we present a case of CCS in remission 12 years post-diagnosis. Case Description/Methods: A 55-year-old man with no past medical history noticed some new onset alopecia, nail dystrophy, and a 25 pounds weight loss, and presented to the hospital with the chief complaint of uncontrolled non-bloody diarrhea. He denied any other systemic symptoms. After a negative initial workup, the patient was seen by GI who performed a double scope that showed findings suggestive of CCS, later confirmed on biopsy. The patient was started on systemic steroid therapy followed by a steroid sparing regimen (mercaptopurine and 2 antihistamine medications). The patient responded well and reported weight gain and resolution of diarrhea, Alopecia, and nail dystrophy a few months later. The patient has been on this medication regimen for 12 years with no reported flares. Surveillance EGD and colonoscopy every 2 years since diagnosis has consistently shown a decreasing number of CCS polyps and eventual cocomplete resolution. The last scopes 2 years ago showed no polyps. We note that the patient was diagnosed with membranous glomerulonephritis 1-year after a CCS diagnosis, and prostate cancer 10 years post-diagnosis. Here we report a case of CCS 12 years in remission with close monitoring (Figure 1). Discussion: CCS is a rare GI disease with no clear causality profile. Current medical literature classifies the disease prognosis as poor. Here we report a case of CCS that was successfully managed and closely monitored for over 12 years. The success achieved in this case may provide some reassurance on available effective therapy. Moreover, this case may suggest that available current medical therapy like the regimen used in this case might improve the prognosis of CCS.Figure 1.: (A-B) Multiple small sessile polyps in the stomach and duodenum. (C) Multiple small erythematous sessile polyps were throughout the colon. (D) Hypoechoic heterogeneous polyps arising from the mucosal layer; No perigastric lymph nodes. (E)Onychodystrophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".