MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S2958 Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome: A Rare Cause of Gastrointestinal Polyposis With Response to Emerging Therapy

2023· article· en· W4387752009 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevork Khadarian, Rish K. Pai, N. Jewel Samadder

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoalbuminemiaColonoscopyGastroenterologyInternal medicineCollagenous colitisDiarrheaDysgeusiaWeight lossDermatologyArgon plasma coagulationCancerColorectal cancerAdverse effectEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome (CCS) is a rare, non-hereditary polyposis syndrome without established diagnostic criteria or therapy. Reported cases typically present with chronic diarrhea and weight loss, placing the onus for diagnosis on gastroenterologists. Treatment mostly consists of steroids, but the estimated 5-year mortality remains at 55% emphasizing need for early recognition and novel effective therapy. Here, we discuss a unique presentation of steroid refractory CCS, treated successfully with adalimumab. Case Description/Methods: A 70-year-old man presented with 6-months of dysgeusia, followed by chronic, non-bloody diarrhea occurring 12 times per day. Associated symptoms included a 45 lb unintentional weight loss and onycholysis. The patient denied taking over-the-counter or prescription medication. Family and social history were non-contributory. General examination revealed bitemporal wasting, onychodystrophy and well-defined hyperpigmented macules along the lower extremities. Abdomen was scaphoid. Serum was notable for anemia (Hgb 10.1 g/dL) and hypoalbuminemia (1.9 g/dl). Stool analyses revealed elevated fecal calprotectin (1,840 mcg/g), normal osmolar gap, and negative infectious panel. CT enterography revealed pancolonic diffuse thickening and unremarkable small bowel. EGD discovered edema and confluent nodularity in the gastric antrum and entire examined duodenum, with a normal esophagus (Figure 1A, B). Colonoscopy uncovered patches of polypoid nodular mucosa (Figure 1C, D). Biopsies of the nodular mucosa were consistent with hamartomatous polyps, while biopsies of the intervening, normal appearing mucosa demonstrated edema with crypt architectural distortion. Other hereditary polyposis syndromes were excluded with Invitae Multi-Cancer Panel analysis, confirming a diagnosis of CCS. Adalimumab therapy was initiated after non-response to prednisone. Discussion: CCS is an extremely rare disease—presenting initially with dysgeusia even more so. Additionally, almost all cases in literature have demonstrated some response to corticosteroid therapy. Here, the patient did not respond to prednisone, and so transitioned to adalimumab. After 6-months there was significant improvement as noted by a marked reduction in frequency of bowel movements, increase in weight by 4.9 kg, normalization of serum albumin, and decrease in fecal calprotectin to 198 mcg/g. This case sheds light on a rare but real disease and proposes a potential therapy for steroid refractory patients.Figure 1.: Endoscopic imaging at time of diagnosis (A). Edematous and nodular gastric antrum with polypoid features. (B) Edematous and nodular duodenal bulb and second portion of the duodenum, with polypoid features. (C) Transverse colon with moderate to severe erythema and edema, with increased polypoid burden compared to left colon. (D) Appendiceal orifice surrounded by multiple sessile polypoid lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→