MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387766006 · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2023.101148

XBP1 splicing contributes to endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced human islet amyloid polypeptide up-regulation

2023· article· en· W4387766006 on OpenAlexaff
Yun Zhang, Susan Lin, Wantong Cai, Huaqiu Chen, Ailikemu Aierken, Zhe Wang, Weihong Song

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes & Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumXBP1Unfolded protein responseRNA splicingIsletCell biologyChemistryAmyloid (mycology)BiochemistryBiologyInsulinEndocrinologyGeneRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a pathological hallmark of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), islet amyloid is formed by the aggregation of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP). Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress interacts with IAPP aggregates and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of T2DM. To examine the role of ER stress in T2DM, we cloned the hIAPP promoter and analyzed its promoter activity in human β-cells. We found that ER stress significantly enhanced hIAPP promoter activity and expression in human β-cells via triggering X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) splicing. We identified a binding site of XBP1 in the hIAPP promoter. Disruption of this binding site by substitution or deletion mutagenesis significantly diminished the effects of ER stress on hIAPP promoter activity. Blockade of XBP splicing by MKC3946 treatment inhibited ER stress-induced hIAPP up-regulation and improved human β-cell survival and function. Our study uncovers a link between ER stress and IAPP at the transcriptional level and may provide novel insights into the role of ER stress in IAPP cytotoxicity and the pathogenesis of T2DM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes & DiseasesSame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207