MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387766027 · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105360

Protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 plays a noncatalytic role in the histone methylation activity of PRMT1

2023· article· en· W4387766027 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael J. Rowley, Riley A. Prout‐Holm, Rui Wen Liu, Thordur Hendrickson-Rebizant, Olufola O. Ige, Ted M. Lakowski, Adam Frankel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHistoneHistone methyltransferaseMethylationHistone H4Histone methylationEpigeneticsHistone H2AHistone H3BiologyArginineBiochemistryMolecular biologyChemistryDNA methylationGene expressionAmino acidGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein arginine N-methyltransferases are a family of epigenetic enzymes responsible for monomethylation or dimethylation of arginine residues on histones. Dysregulation of protein arginine N-methyltransferase activity can lead to aberrant gene expression and cancer. Recent studies have shown that PRMT2 expression and histone H3 methylation at arginine 8 are correlated with disease severity in glioblastoma multiforme, hepatocellular carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma. In this study, we explore a noncatalytic mechanistic role for PRMT2 in histone methylation by investigating interactions between PRMT2, histone peptides and proteins, and other PRMTs using analytical and enzymatic approaches. We quantify interactions between PRMT2, peptide ligands, and PRMT1 in a cofactor- and domain-dependent manner using differential scanning fluorimetry. We found that PRMT2 modulates the substrate specificity of PRMT1. Using calf thymus histones as substrates, we saw that a 10-fold excess of PRMT2 promotes PRMT1 methylation of both histone H4 and histone H2A. We found equimolar or a 10-fold excess of PRMT2 to PRMT1 can improve the catalytic efficiency of PRMT1 towards individual histone substrates H2A, H3, and H4. We further evaluated the effects of PRMT2 towards PRMT1 on unmodified histone octamers and mononucleosomes and found marginal PRMT1 activity improvements in histone octamers but significantly greater methylation of mononucleosomes in the presence of 10-fold excess of PRMT2. This work reveals the ability of PRMT2 to serve a noncatalytic role through its SH3 domain in driving site-specific histone methylation marks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207