MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387767163 · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2023.103234

Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from pediatric patients with congenital myotonic dystrophy (CBRCULi012-A and CBRCULi013-A) and age-matched controls (CBRCULi010-A and CBRCULi011-A)

2023· article· en· W4387767163 on OpenAlexafffund
Thiéry De Serres‐Bérard, Dominic Jauvin, Jack Puymirat, Mohamed Chahine

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation CHU de QuébecFrench Muscular Dystrophy AssociationAdvanced Foods and Materials CanadaU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsMyotonic dystrophyBiologyInduced pluripotent stem cellTrinucleotide repeat expansionGeneticsMyotoniaAlleleGeneCell biologyMolecular biologyEmbryonic stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital myotonic dystrophy (CDM) is an autosomal dominant multisystemic disorder attributed to a large expansion of CTG trinucleotide repeats within the myotonic dystrophy protein kinase (DMPK) gene. In this study, we successfully reprogrammed dermal fibroblasts derived from two pediatric CDM patients and two age-matched individuals into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) using a non-integrating viral vector. The resulting CDM iPSC lines harbored approximately 2000 CTG repeats in the mutated DMPK allele. These iPSC lines expressed pluripotency markers and exhibited the capacity to differentiate into cells representing all three germinal layers, confirming their reliability as a research tool for investigating CDM and therapeutic strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ResearchSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207