Identifying Patterns of Medical Intervention in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Observational Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Characterizing medical interventions delivered to ICU patients over time and their relationship to outcomes can help set expectations and inform decisions made by patients, clinicians, and health systems. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether distinct and clinically relevant pathways of medical intervention can be identified among adult ICU patients with acute respiratory failure. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective observational study using all-payer administrative claims data from 2012 to 2014. Patients were identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases from Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patterns of cumulative medical intervention delivery, over time, using temporal k-means clustering of interventions delivered up to hospital days 0, 5, 10, 20, and up to discharge. RESULTS: = 3,045). Without applying a priori classification and using only medical interventions to cluster, we identified three distinct pathways of intervention accounting for 93.5% of training set admissions. We found 45.9% of admissions followed a "cardiac" intervention pathway (e.g., cardiac catheterization, cardioversion); 36.7% followed a "general" pathway (e.g., diagnostic interventions); and 17.4% followed a "prolonged" pathway (e.g., tracheostomy, gastrostomy). Prolonged pathway admissions had longer median hospital length of stay (13 d; interquartile range [IQR], 7.5-18.5 d) compared with cardiac (5; IQR, 2.5-7.5) and general (5; IQR, 3-7). In-hospital death occurred in 24.6% of prolonged pathway admissions compared with 17.9% of cardiac and 6.9% of general. Findings were confirmed in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most ICU admissions for acute respiratory failure follow one of three clinically relevant pathways of medical intervention which are associated with hospitalization outcomes. This study helps define the longitudinal nature of critical care delivery, which can inform efforts to predict patient outcomes, communicate with patients and their families, and organize critical care resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".