The Use of High‐Temperature Semi‐Batch Radical Polymerization to Synthesize Acrylate Based Macromonomers and Structured Copolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A high‐temperature starved‐feed semi‐batch operating policy is developed to produce p(acrylates) with high macromonomer content, taking advantage of side reactions inherent to acrylate radical polymerization. This operating strategy results in significantly higher macromonomer content for the polymerization of isobornyl acrylate (iBoA) versus n ‐butyl acrylate (BA) under identical operating conditions. This is because steric hindrance favors fragmentation (i.e., terminal double bond (TDB) formation) over addition (i.e., short‐chain or long‐chain branch (LCB) formation), thus increasing the p(iBoA) TDB content and decreasing polymer dispersity. The p(iBoA) macromonomer solution serves as an excellent addition‐fragmentation agent to polymerize a second monomer in a single pot process controlled by sequential feeding, as demonstrates by the production of iBoA‐BA block and comb copolymer structures at different temperatures and macromonomer concentrations. The incorporation of the p(iBoA) macromonomer into a copolymer product is verified by various techniques, including polymer fractionation followed by TDB, composition, and molar mass analyses. Reaction temperature plays a key role in determining whether a blocky versus comb copolymer structure is produced. The ability to synthesize block and comb copolymers by radical polymerization without a mediating agent offers the potential to efficiently produce structured copolymers for industrial applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".