Unequal Timeliness Protection Random Access Scheme for Satellite Internet of Things
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To satisfy the diversified timeliness requirements in massive machine-type communications (mMTC) for satellite Internet of Things (S-IoT), we propose two unequal timeliness protection (UT) schemes based on the grant free age-optimal (GFAO) random access protocol, where the number of access slots in a frame can be adjusted according to the system load to achieve the required age of information (AoI) performance. We first propose the independent UT protection (IUT) scheme, where the different groups of user equipments (UEs) are successively access according to their AoI priority. Then, we propose the expanded UT protection (EUT) scheme, where the lower priority groups are allowed to offloading access with the higher priority groups. By exploiting Markov analysis through tracing the instantaneous AoI evolution of UE from each priority group, we derive the closed-form expressions to the average AoI (AAoI) of different priority groups and the system AAoI for multitype services coexistence mMTC in practical S-IoT. Simulation results show that both of IUT and EUT schemes can satisfy the AAoI of the higher priority groups, and the EUT scheme can improve the AAoI of the lower priority group, thus improve the system AAoI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it