MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Private Blockchain-Based Wireless Body Area Network Platform for Wearable Internet of Thing Devices in Healthcare

2023· article· en· W4387870188 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Jayson Baucas, Petros Spachos, Stefano Gregori

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBody area networkWearable computerComputer scienceWearable technologyComputer securityComputer networkHealth careInternet of ThingsBlockchainWirelessWireless networkEmbedded systemWireless sensor networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, healthcare systems have included the Internet of Things (IoT) technology in their services, such as in remote patient monitoring systems. Wearable IoT devices can provide information regarding the patient's health that are accurate and time-sensitive. However, vulnerabilities are evident as more IoT devices connect to the network. For healthcare services, the security of patient data is an issue. At the same time, with real-time data transmissions, the network runs into manageability concerns. In this work, we propose a private blockchain-based Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) platform to aid wearable IoT devices in healthcare services. We chose this blockchain technology due to its strengths in security. Then, we enable a distributive architecture using WBANs to introduce a decentralized configuration that can ensure privacy among wearable IoT devices within the network. To evaluate the feasibility of the proposed platform in terms of latency and throughput, we conducted experiments with several wearable IoT devices. The results show that integrating a WBAN to create a fog server improves the network performance with an increasing number of IoT devices and packet size. Also, the blockchain showed its ability to address security threats in healthcare services. We evaluate our proposed platform through a performance test and a STRIDE threat model, and we prove its feasibility in improving the security and manageability of wearable IoT devices in healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207