Active Sensing for Localization with Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses an uplink localization problem in which the base station (BS) aims to locate a remote user with the aid of reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS). This paper proposes a strategy in which the user transmits pilots over multiple time frames, and the BS adaptively adjusts the RIS reflection coefficients based on the observations already received so far in order to produce an accurate estimate of the user location at the end. This is a challenging active sensing problem for which finding an optimal solution involves a search through a complicated functional space whose dimension increases with the number of measurements. In this paper, we show that the long short-term memory (LSTM) network can be used to exploit the latent temporal correlation between measurements to automatically construct scalable information vectors (called hidden state) based on the measurements. Subsequently, the state vector can be mapped to the RIS configuration for the next time frame in a codebook-free fashion via a deep neural network (DNN). After all the measurements have been received, a final DNN can be used to map the LSTM cell state to the estimated user equipment (UE) position. Numerical result shows that the proposed active RIS design results in lower localization error as compared to existing active and nonactive methods. The proposed solution produces interpretable results and is generalizable to early stopping in the sequence of sensing stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it