MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance Analysis of Indoor THz Networks with Intelligent Reflective Surfaces

2023· article· en· W4387870764 on OpenAlexaff
Omran Abbas, Nour Kouzayha, Mustafa A. Kishk, Hadi Sarieddeen, Mohamed‐Slim Alouini, Tareq Y. Al-Naffouri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology
KeywordsTerahertz radiationComputer scienceWirelessInterference (communication)PhotonicsStochastic geometryTelecommunications linkReflection (computer programming)Electromagnetic interferenceSensitivity (control systems)Computer networkElectronic engineeringDistributed computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent breakthroughs in electronic and photonic technologies enabled the design and implementation of intelligent reflective surfaces (IRSs) to manipulate electromagnetic waves and control the wireless environment. A promising application of IRSs is their integration with Terahertz (THz) communications. IRSs can cope with the blockage sensitivity of THz propagation by providing alternative line-of-sight (LoS) links to user equipment (UEs) which are initially blocked. However, deploying more IRSs may degrade the network performance as it leads to non-negligible interference levels. In this paper, we use tools from stochastic geometry to investigate the coverage probability of a downlink (DL) indoor THz network assisted by IRSs, which are added to a subset of the existing blockages. The numerical results reveal that there is an optimal density of IRSs that should be deployed to maximize the coverage of UEs in THz networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207