MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387894968 · doi:10.1515/9783110795431-008

8 Investigating Social and Environmental Impacts of the Indian Clothing Sector

2023· book-chapter· en· W4387894968 on OpenAlexaff
Manish Mishra, Rohit Kushwaha, Nimit Gupta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingSustainabilityBusinessFast fashionConsumption (sociology)Environmental degradationProduction (economics)CommerceMarketingEconomicsGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The clothing sector is one of the oldest trades, having import and export practices from all corners of the world.Clothing is one of the most prominent economic activities in the globally competitive world.It has been innovating to satisfy the growing demands of customers.The buying preference in the clothing industry has been ever-changing, uneven and hyper-individual.Increasing demand in its consumption has exponentially increased production.Consumers demand affordable clothes and find quick disposal convenient, leading to increased harmful waste generation.The inferior composition of material processing leads to enhanced soil contaminations and excessive wastage of water, resulting in massive environmental and social degradation, which is often beyond repair.Natural fabrics are now increasing in demand to address the health and environmental concerns of many of the current consumers.Thus, sustainability is becoming the primary concern for some fashion brands, both in terms of projecting the right image and modifying the manufacturing processes to address these rising awareness and concerns.The present chapter explores the environmental and social impacts of the Indian clothing sector through a theoretical investigation from past research insights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207