EVALUATION OF ECONOMIC CHARACTERS OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE FOOTHILL-STEPPE ZONE OF EAST KAZAKHSTAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Half of the world’s plant protein consumption is made up of soy proteins. The cost of soy protein is several times lower than protein of animal origin. A third of the vegetable oil consumed by humans in the world is soybean oil. More than 400 types of food products are produced from soybean grains. The rapid development of the soybean growing and processing industry predetermines the expansion of commercial seed production volumes. This may be achieved by introducing highly productive commercial soybean varieties into other regions. This paper discusses the research findings on economic characters of 38 soybean varieties developed in Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Germany, Canada and China under the conditions of the foothill-steppe zone of East Kazakhstan. The experiments were carried out under rainfed conditions. The length of the growing season and the yield formula of the varieties were determined. The indices of the protein and oil content in the seeds were evaluated. Regarding the length of the growing season, the varieties belong to the ultra-early ripening, very early ripening and early ripening groups. All studied varieties ripen under the conditions of the foothill-steppe zone of East Kazakhstan. Significant gains of 0.24-0.89 t ha of seed yields over the control were obtained from the following varieties: Vostochnaya krasavitsa, Tanais, Korsak, Saska, L. Viz, VNIIS-1, Dauriya, and Oressa. The lowest yields were obtained from the following varieties: Kharbin, L-N-S, Altom, Kofu, and Sibiryachka. The highest protein content in seeds was found in the varieties Alua - 39.4% and Vostochnaya krasavitsa - 39.0%. Protein content from 37.3 to 36.0% was found in the following varieties: Oressa, Ros, Pripyat, Volma, Lybid, Garmoniya, L-S-6, Sibiryachka, Zolotistaya, Soer 4, Daneliya and Saule. In the varieties Birlik KV, Vostochnaya krasavitsa, Alua, Lidiya, Dauriya, Soer 4, Amurskaya 401, L-S-6, Skulptor, Sunrise, Lybid, Desna, Tanais and Korsak, the thousand-seed weight was above 140 g. The largest seed weight was found in the varieties Korsak - 184.3 g and Tanais - 177.3 g.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".