MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387901509 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.265

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term risk of maternal stroke - a systematic review

2023· review· en· W4387901509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew P. Brohan, Fionn P. Daly, Louise Kelly, Fergus P. McCarthy, A S Khashan, Karolina Kublickiene, Peter Barrett

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational hypertensionPreeclampsiaStroke (engine)PregnancyRelative riskCohort studyMeta-analysisEpidemiologyCINAHLObservational studyObstetricsInternal medicinePediatricsConfidence intervalPsychological interventionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with a long-term risk for cardiovascular disease among parous patients later in life. However, relatively little is known about whether HDP are associated with an increased risk for ischaemic stroke (IS) or haemorrhagic stroke (HS) in later life. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the available literature on the association between HDP and the long-term risk for maternal stroke. PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception to December 19, 2022. Studies included were case-control or cohort studies, conducted with human participants, available in English, measuring the exposure of a history of HDP (preeclampsia (PE), gestational hypertension (GH), chronic hypertension (CH), or superimposed preeclampsia) and the outcome of maternal IS or HS. Three reviewers extracted the data and appraised the study quality following the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome was any undifferentiated stroke (AS) and secondary outcomes included IS and HS. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021254660). 24 studies were included (10,632,808 study participants). HDP were significantly associated with AS (aRR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.45-2.10). PE was significantly associated with AS (aRR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.56-1.97), IS (aRR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.46-2.06), and HS (aRR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.04-3.75). GH was significantly associated with AS (aRR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.20-1.26), IS (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.19-1.53), and HS (aRR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.02-6.98). CH was associated with IS (aRR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01-2.19). In conclusion, exposure to HDP, including PE and GH, seems to be associated with an increased risk for AS and IS among parous patients in later life. Preventive interventions may be warranted for patients who experience HDP to reduce their long-term risk for stroke. Key messages • Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy appear to be associated with an increased risk of maternal stroke in later life. • The strength of association between exposures and outcomes varies by hypertensive disorder of pregnancy subtype and stroke subtype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.008
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207