Pharmacokinetics of cycloheximide in rats and evaluation of its effect as a blocker of intestinal lymph formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cycloheximide (CHX) has been used to reduce the flow of intestinal lymph and as a non-surgical tool to study drug absorption via the intestinal lymphatics. Pharmacokinetic information on the agent, and its relationship to effect and toxicity, have not been examined. The goal of this study was to provide pharmacokinetic data and link it to lymph-blocking and toxicological effects. Jugular-vein cannulated (JVC) adult Sprague-Dawley male rats were administered 0.5 mg/kg CHX by oral, intraperitoneal (ip), and intravenous routes followed by blood draws, and CHX was assayed using LC-MS/MS. Another four JVC rats were given peanut oil (2 mL/kg) without and then with CHX to measure effects on lipid absorption as a surrogate indicator of lymph flow. One-week later plasma biochemistry measures were obtained. The results indicated that CHX had a high clearance and volume of distribution, and oral absolute bioavailability of 0.47 with 0.5 mg/kg. CHX was associated with dose- and route-dependent pharmacokinetics. The relative bioavailability after ip doses was over 3. CHX had low plasma protein binding and minor urinary excretion. Metabolism appeared to be occur by oxidation and glucuronidation. Reductions in plasma lipids (24-40 %) were seen after 2.5 mg/kg orally with signs of inflammation and increased liver enzymes persisting for a week after the dose. CHX was associated with a reduction in lipid absorption after oral doses of 2.5 mg/kg, which seems to justify its use as a non-surgical tool to evaluate the lymphatic pathway of absorption of drugs. However, it also possesses hepatotoxicity, which should be taken into consideration in its use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".