MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387912119 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1564

Alcohol per capita and prevalence of alcohol exposed pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis

2023· article· en· W4387912119 on OpenAlexaff
Edel Burton, Stephen R. Kelly, Patricia M. Kearney, Malcolm Moffat, Joan K. Morris, Svetlana Popova, Judith Rankin, Mary O’Mahony

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisPregnancyPopulationAlcoholSystematic reviewPer capitaEnvironmental healthAlcohol consumptionMEDLINEDemographyObstetricsInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Alcohol is a teratogen that crosses the placenta. While studies have estimated the global burden of alcohol use in pregnancy, reliable and valid data on alcohol consumption during pregnancy in many countries is lacking. Alcohol consumption per capita (APC) data are available worldwide. This systematic review, by investigating the association between APC and alcohol consumption in pregnancy by country, aims to evaluate the accuracy of using APC data to predict the prevalence of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE). Methods This study combines studies identified in a systematic review by Popova et al. 2017 and a systematic search of MEDLINE from 2015 through 6th October 2022, to identify additional papers. Papers identified in either search were on the prevalence of PAE or fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS). Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, full-text articles and performed data extraction and quality assessment. APC data,per country, by year, was obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO) website. A meta-analysis, assuming a random effects model will be performed. Sensitivity analyses, including restricting by population, timing of exposure, time and method of ascertainment of alcohol consumption will be carried out. Results Of 24,935 PAE and 12,231 FAS prevalence articles identified, 400 PAE studies and 77 FAS studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies represent data from 1959-2020 from all 6 WHO regions, with APC between 0.012-14.78. Preliminary analysis suggests a statistically significant correlation between prevalence of alcohol consumption during pregnancy and APC. Conclusions Preliminary results from this study suggest that publicly available data on APC can be used to predict the population-based prevalence of alcohol use in pregnancy in different countries. Effective policies and interventions are required to reduce APC and thus, alcohol use in pregnancy and associated detrimental child health outcomes around the globe. Key messages • Knowing the prevalence of FAS and its main risk factor- prenatal alcohol use, will inform the setting of priorities for public health policy, public health initiatives, and health-care planning. • By investigating the association between alcohol intake in pregnancy and APC we will assess whether APC can predict alcohol intake in pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.034
Bibliometrics0.0090.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects→French-language works237,207→