MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SMA-Based Tuning of PI Controller Using Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Observers for an Electromechanical System with Variable Parameters

2023· article· en· W4387914431 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra-Iulia Szedlak-Stinean, Radu‐Emil Precup, Raul‐Cristian Roman, Emil M. Petriu, Elena‐Lorena Hedrea

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Moment of inertiaFuzzy logicNonlinear systemController (irrigation)Fuzzy control systemMathematicsMoment (physics)Convergence (economics)Stability (learning theory)Observer (physics)Computer scienceControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a conventional control structure with two Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Observers (TSFOs) for estimating the angular speed, the overall moment of inertia and the roller radius for an electromechanical system with variable parameters. The described TSFOs are used to estimate states in a complex and nonlinear mechanism, namely strip winding system, which has the capability to wrap a strip with invariable linear speed on a roller knowing that the angular speed and the overall moment of inertia are being modified by the variable roller radius. This paper derives the conditions for the stability of the control system and the observer development, which are represented as linear matrix inequalities. The effectiveness of TSFOs is evaluated with regard to achieving a specific rate of convergence. The conventional control structure employs, in conjunction with the two TSFOs a Proportional-Integral controller with parameters optimally tuned using a metaheuristic slime mould algorithm that solves the optimization problems with objective functions described as the integrals of squared control errors multiplied by time. The control system efficacy is demonstrated and validated through digital simulation results focusing on a comparative analysis of the two TSFOs with the optimally tuned parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207