Achieving Covert Communication in Large-Scale SWIPT-Enabled D2D Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We aim to develop a system-level security solution for a large-scale device-to-device (D2D) network against adversaries based on covert communication. The D2D network underlays a downlink cellular network to reuse the cellular spectrum and is enabled for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT). In the D2D network, the D2D transmitters communicate with the D2D receivers, and the D2D receivers extract information and energy from their received radio-frequency (RF) signals. In the meantime, the adversaries aim to detect the D2D transmission. The D2D network applies power control and leverages the cellular signal to achieve covert communication (i.e., hide the presence of transmissions) so as to defend against the adversaries. We model the interaction between the D2D network and adversaries by using a two-stage Stackelberg game. Therein, the adversaries are the followers minimizing their detection errors at the lower stage and the D2D network is the leader maximizing its network utility constrained by the communication covertness and power outage at the upper stage. Both power splitting (PS)-based and time switch (TS)-based SWIPT schemes are explored. We characterize the spatial configuration of the large-scale D2D network, adversaries, and cellular network by stochastic geometry. We analyze the adversary’s detection error minimization problem and adopt the Rosenbrock method to solve it, where the obtained solution is the best response from the lower stage. Taking into account the best response from the lower stage, we develop a bi-level algorithm to solve the D2D network’s constrained network utility maximization problem and obtain the Stackelberg equilibrium. We present numerical results to reveal interesting insights. For example, the PS-based SWIPT scheme outperforms the TS-based SWIPT scheme in terms of both network performance (e.g., link reliability and power outage probability) and resistance to the adversary, i.e., steady network utility against increasing aggressiveness of the adversary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".