MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387924192 · doi:10.1061/jswbay.sweng-528

Performance Assessment of Stormwater Management Infrastructures in a Parking Lot near Montreal, Canada

2023· article· en· W4387924192 on OpenAlexaffabout
Véronique Guay, Negin Binesh, Sophie Duchesne, Geneviève Pelletier, Guillaume Grégoire

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioretentionEnvironmental scienceStormwaterSurface runoffGreen infrastructureHydrology (agriculture)DrainagePerennial plantStormwater managementWater qualityStormEnvironmental engineeringAgronomyGeographyEcologyEngineeringBiologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stormwater control measures, including green and gray infrastructures, are increasingly used to enhance the level of sustainability of conventional drainage networks in managing rainfall-induced runoff. This paper studies the water quality and hydrologic performances of some bioretention cells and permeable pavements located in a parking lot in Boucherville (near Montreal), Canada, between July 2020 and November 2021. Because plants play a major role in the performance of green infrastructure, plant survival and growth monitoring were also conducted from June to September 2021. The results showed average runoff volume and average peak flow reductions of 91% and 98%, respectively, while the average delay in peak flow, for the few storm events with outflow, was 6.7 h. The average removal rates (in terms of concentration) for suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen were 96%, 79%, 81%, and 90%, respectively, while there was an average increase in electric conductivity of 14%. The survival rate of trees planted in bioretention cells was 100%. For bushes, survival rates indicated a variation between 54% and 100%, while for perennials, survival rates varied between 0% and 100%. The plants with the least survival rates were Alchemilla mollis when planted at the top, with 0%, Rudbeckia fulgida var. ‘Pot of Gold,’ with 74%, and Salix purpurea ‘Gracilis,’ with 54%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built EnvironmentSame topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207