MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387942370 · doi:10.11834/jrs.20233174

Integrating ensemble prediction constraints and error prediction entropy maximization for MLS point cloud classification

2023· article· en· W4387942370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiangda Lei

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Remote Sensing Bulletin · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEntropy maximizationEntropy (arrow of time)Cloud computingPoint cloudEnsemble forecastingArtificial intelligenceData miningPrinciple of maximum entropyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ç›®å‰ï¼Œè®¸å¤šæ·±åº¦å­¦ä¹ ç‚¹äº‘åˆ†ç±»æ–¹æ³•é€šè¿‡å¢žåŠ ç‚¹äº‘ç‰¹å¾èšåˆæ¨¡å—ï¼Œå¢žå¼ºç‚¹äº‘ç‰¹å¾çš„è¡¨è¾¾èƒ½åŠ›ã€‚ä½†è¯¥ç±»æ–¹æ³•å¾€å¾€ä¼šå¸¦æ¥è®­ç»ƒå‚æ•°å¢žåŠ ä»¥åŠæ¨¡åž‹è¿‡æ‹Ÿåˆçš„é—®é¢˜ã€‚é’ˆå¯¹è¯¥é—®é¢˜ï¼Œæœ¬æ–‡æå‡ºäº†ä¸€ä¸ªæ•´åˆé›†æˆé¢„æµ‹çº¦æŸä¸Žé”™è¯¯é¢„æµ‹ç†µæœ€å¤§åŒ–çš„æ·±åº¦å­¦ä¹ æ–¹æ³•ç”¨äºŽç§»åŠ¨æ¿€å ‰æ‰«æï¼ˆMobile Laser Scanning, MLSï¼‰ç‚¹äº‘åˆ†ç±»ã€‚æ–¹æ³•é€šè¿‡é›†æˆé¢„æµ‹çº¦æŸåˆ†æ”¯ä»¥åŠé”™è¯¯é¢„æµ‹ç†µæœ€å¤§åŒ–åˆ†æ”¯å¯ä»¥åœ¨ä¸å¢žåŠ è®­ç»ƒå‚æ•°çš„æƒ å†µä¸‹ï¼Œå¢žå¼ºåŸºçº¿ç½‘ç»œçš„ç‚¹äº‘ç‰¹å¾è¡¨è¾¾ï¼Œæé«˜æ¨¡åž‹æ³›åŒ–èƒ½åŠ›ã€‚å ¶ä¸­é›†æˆé¢„æµ‹çº¦æŸåˆ†æ”¯é¦–å ˆé€šè¿‡è®°å½•ç‚¹äº‘åœ¨è®­ç»ƒè¿‡ç¨‹ä¸­çš„é¢„æµ‹å€¼ï¼Œç”Ÿæˆé›†æˆé¢„æµ‹å€¼ï¼Œç„¶åŽé‡‡ç”¨ä¸€è‡´æ€§çº¦æŸå¢žå¼ºæ¨¡åž‹çš„ç‚¹äº‘ç‰¹å¾è¡¨è¾¾ã€‚é”™è¯¯é¢„æµ‹ç†µæœ€å¤§åŒ–æ–¹æ³•é¼“åŠ±æ¨¡åž‹å¯¹é”™è¯¯é¢„æµ‹ç‚¹è¿›è¡Œç†µå€¼æœ€å¤§åŒ–ï¼Œå¢žåŠ è¯¥ç‚¹çš„ä¸ç¡®å®šæ€§ï¼Œæé«˜æ¨¡åž‹çš„æ³›åŒ–èƒ½åŠ›ã€‚æ‰€ææ–¹æ³•åœ¨å¤šä¸ªå ¬å¼€MLSç‚¹äº‘æ•°æ®é›†ä¸Šè¿›è¡ŒéªŒè¯ï¼Œç»“æžœè¡¨æ˜Žæ‰€ææ–¹æ³•å¯ä»¥åœ¨ä¸å¢žåŠ è®­ç»ƒå‚æ•°çš„æƒ å†µä¸‹ï¼Œæé«˜åŸºçº¿æ–¹æ³•çš„åˆ†ç±»æ€§èƒ½ã€‚ä¸Žå¯¹æ¯”æ–¹æ³•ç›¸æ¯”ï¼Œæ‰€ææ–¹æ³•åœ¨Toronto3D、WHU-MLS、Paris数据集上获得了最优的平均交并比(83.68%、44.19%、65.85%),表明了方法的有效性。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Remote Sensing BulletinSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207