MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387957271 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100506

Enhancement of Pyramid Solar Still Productivity Through Wick Material and Reflective Applications in Iraqi Conditions

2023· article· en· W4387957271 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karrar A. Hammoodi, Hayder A. Dhahad, Wissam H. Alawee, Z.M. Omara

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyramid (geometry)ProductivitySolar stillMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceOpticsEconomicsPhysicsChemistryDesalination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global challenge of water scarcity significantly impacts the socio-economic development of countries, especially in developing regions such as Iraq where accessible potable water is scarce. Solar distillation emerges as a promising technique for desalinating water, particularly through passive solar stills that harness direct solar radiation. This study investigates the performance enhancement of pyramid solar stills, specifically focusing on the employment of wick materials and reflectors under the climatic conditions of Iraq. Wick materials markedly augment the evaporation area and the area for solar radiation absorption, thereby boosting the still's production. Similarly, reflectors play a crucial role in elevating the water temperature in the distillation process, leading to increased evaporation and daily productivity. Results demonstrate that the use of wick materials in the pyramid solar still (CWPSS) significantly outperforms the conventional pyramid solar still (CPSS), with a production increase of 122% and a daily thermal efficiency of 53%, compared to CPSS's 34.5%. Moreover, the application of reflective materials further escalated CWPSS's productivity by 170%, although the distillation efficiency remained constant at 48%. Future research should explore advancements in wick materials, integrated systems, simulation modeling, and field testing to optimize the technology's performance under Iraqi conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicSolar-Powered Water Purification MethodsFrench-language works237,207