MyriadAL: Active Few Shot Learning for Histopathology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Active Learning (AL) and Few Shot Learning (FSL) are two label-efficient methods which have achieved excellent results recently. However, most prior arts in both learning paradigms fail to explore the wealth of the vast unlabelled data. In this study, we address this issue in the scenario where the annotation budget is very limited, yet a large amount of unlabelled data for the target task is available. We frame this work in the context of histopathology where labelling is prohibitively expensive. To this end, we introduce an active few shot learning framework, Myriad Active Learning (MAL), including a contrastive-learning encoder, pseudo-label generation, and novel query sample selection in the loop. Specifically, we propose to massage unlabelled data in a self-supervised manner, where the obtained data representations and clustering knowledge form the basis to activate the AL loop. With feedback from the oracle in each AL cycle, the pseudo-labels of the unlabelled data are refined by optimizing a shallow task-specific net on top of the encoder. These updated pseudo-labels serve to inform and improve the active learning query selection process. Furthermore, we introduce a novel recipe to combine existing uncertainty measures and utilize the entire uncertainty list to reduce sample redundancy in AL. Extensive experiments on two public histopathology datasets show that MAL has superior test accuracy, macro F1-score, and label efficiency compared to prior works, and can achieve a comparable test accuracy to a fully supervised algorithm while labelling only 5% of the dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".