Studi Etnobotani dalam Makanan Tradisional Nasi Liwet, Hidangan Khas Sunda di Kecamatan Mustikajaya, Bekasi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional food is food consumed by a particular community, reflecting the local potential and wisdom, as well as a distinctive flavor accepted by that community. Typically, traditional food is characterized by the characteristics of a region, the values within that region, the manifestation of regional culture, specificity, and the natural potential of each area. Mustikajaya District, Bekasi City, is still predominantly inhabited by the Sundanese people, followed by the Javanese, Malay, and Batak ethnic groups. Consequently, there are still many traditional Sundanese foods distributed and sold in the Mustikajaya District, one of which is Nasi Liwet, a traditional Sundanese dish. Ethnobotanical studies on the traditional Sundanese food, Nasi Liwet, have not been conducted, especially in the Mustikajaya District, Bekasi. This research aims to provide information on the biodiversity used as spices and complementary ingredients. It then connects these ethnobotanical studies with the processing and cultural presentation of Nasi Liwet, as well as the philosophy and historical value of this traditional Sundanese dish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".