Detailed Parametric Modeling of AC–DC Converters for EMT Simulators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detailed switching models (DSM) of ac–dc converters are available in many offline and real-time electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation programs. However, such discrete models typically require small simulation time steps for accurately handling the switching events without interpolation. This paper proposes a new parametric modeling approach for line-commutated and 2-level voltage-source ac–dc converters. The proposed methodology is based on parametric functions that relate ac and dc variables in the instantaneous sense, which allows the reconstruction of the waveforms of voltages and currents (with the same of details as the switching models of converters) without topological changes in the converter circuit. Thus, it can operate at larger time steps without requiring interpolation, thereby enhancing simulation efficiency. The computational advantages of the proposed models over the conventional switching models are demonstrated in offline PSCAD and real-time RTDS NovaCor simulators in terms of maximum possible time step size and accuracy. It is shown that the proposed models can accurately run with much larger time steps (up to ∼200 μs for LCRs, and up to ∼50 μs for VSCs) compared to detailed switching models, which are limited to relatively small time steps of ∼10 μs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".