In The Quarter Century Of The Republic, “Hür Fikirler” Journal's View On Various Political Issues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After the Second World War, the winds of democracy began to blow in Turkey. Thus, the freedom of association and expression was paved, and the number of published political opinion journals increased. One of these magazines is Hür Fikirler, which was published in a liberal line in 1948 and 1949. The journal became the extension of liberal thought in Turkey against the rising socialist thought movement in the world at the beginning of the cold war. Expressing that it does not have a political aim, the management of the journal aimed to create public opinion in the liberal line of thought. In this context, it has included many writers in the identity of intellectuals, journalists and lawyers.In this study, it is aimed to examine the political ideas put forward under various titles in Hür Fikirler magazine. The magazine, which has a very rich variety of topics, mainly includes articles on politics and law, as well as articles on topics such as economy, press-broadcasting, language issues, academic world, and family. In the study, the articles published in the journal were examined by collecting them under thematic headings of "democracy; competition of systems and the future of the world; bicameral procedure; law-justice-judiciary; republican reforms; Turkish and language issue; the negative impact of modernization on the family". The magazine did not directly enter Turkey's domestic political issues, but mainly focused on the world agenda. However, it also referred to Turkey's internal problems, sometimes directly and sometimes indirectly. Hür Fikirler magazine has taken its place on the side of Liberal Capitalism in the struggle of Capitalism-Socialism in the World and has handled world issues with this approach. This is the essential feature of the ideological identity of the journal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".