MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388009531 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21403

Determination of Hansen solubility parameters of water-soluble proteins using UV–vis spectrophotometry

2023· article· en· W4388009531 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Neveen AlQasas, Daniel Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTamkeenYork UniversityNew York University Abu Dhabi
KeywordsSolubilityDissolutionChemistrySpectrophotometryUltraviolet visible spectroscopySolventChromatographyBovine serum albuminMacromoleculeOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Determination of solubility parameters by dissolution tests are difficult for some valuable molecules, such as proteins, where the quantities available are small, UV-vis spectroscopy can determine dissolved concentrations of even small amounts of material, but accurate determination of dissolution is difficult in relatively poor solvents, due to difficulty with constructing a reliable calibration curve. In this work we report a new simple procedure to determine the relative dissolution of proteins in various solvents using UV vis spectroscopy for the determination of Hansen solubility parameters (HSP) of proteins. This method allows qualitative determination of the amounts of BSA dissolved in various solvents. The amounts of BSA dissolved in each solvent, can then be used to rank solvents as good or bad for HSP calculation purpose, which gives more reliable ranking than observation alone in dissolution tests. To be able to evaluate the HSP of any solid material, the solubility of the tested material in a range of solvents needs to be determined. Solvents are then scored as good or bad based on observations and from the known properties of those solvents, the HSP of the solute molecule in question can be calculated. Here, bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a model protein, but the procedure reported here can be applied to any soluble protein or other macromolecule with a clear UV/vis adsorption peak. This procedure requires the tested material to be highly soluble in water, therefore eliminating the need for the preparation of many standard solutions of BSA in different solvents. Only a set of standard solutions of protein in water is required. UV-vis spectroscopy was used to analyze the remaining solid resuspended in water after centrifugation of solutions of BSA dissolved in other solvents to separate any undissolved protein. The HSP of BSA obtained via this procedure was compared to values previously obtained for BSA using other methods. A very good agreement between the HSP obtained in this work with the that reported by Houen et al. which used amino acid analysis for the estimation of the solubility of BSA in various organic solvents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207