The Utilization of Abandoned Land in Indonesia: A Comparative Study on Malaysia in the Fulfillment of Human Rights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indonesia has established regulations on the location of Abandoned Land Utilization.However, the important question is whether the regulation is effective and whether the utilization has become a means of fulfilling human rights over land.This study aims to analyze the utilization of abandoned land that is an effort to fulfill human rights over land.This study is a normative legal study.It used secondary data with primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials.It covers the mechanisms and procedures to eliminate and to utilize abandoned land, its social function, as well as the relationship and relevance between fulfillment of human rights to land and the utilization of abandoned land.It also compared the similar case to Malaysian case.The results show that the state must make efficient use of abandoned land and prioritize the principle of social function rather than to make land as merely an economic commodity owned by certain groups.Moreover, the amount of land is fixed but the demand continues to increase.Therefore, the efforts to utilize abandoned land are a progressive solution because the goal of agrarian reform is for equity and social justice, especially for the poor.The result of research shows that the regulation of abandoned land is carried out using Law and the land that has been determined as the abandoned one will be taken over by the state using simple mechanism and in Malaysia vertical attachment principle is used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".