Investigation of Fuel Injection Pressure Impact on Dimethyl Ether Combustion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Compression ignition engines used in heavy-duty applications are typically powered by diesel fuel. The high energy density and feedstock abundance provide a continuing source for the immense energy demand. However, the heavy-duty transportation sector is challenged with lowering greenhouse gas and combustion by-product emissions, including carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter. The continuing development of engine management and combustion strategies has proven the ability to meet current regulations, particularly with higher fuel injection pressure. Nonetheless, a transition from diesel to a renewable alternative fuel source will play a significant role in reducing greenhouse gases while maintaining the convenience and energy density inherent in liquid fuels. Dimethyl ether is a versatile fuel that possesses combustion properties suitable for compression ignition engines and physical properties helpful for clean combustion. The higher volatility of DME may permit lower injection pressure than diesel fueling systems to achieve adequate atomization and mixing. In this work, an empirical study of the DME fuel injection pressure was conducted based on combustion and emission characteristics.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The DME injection pressure was tested from 200bar to 770bar. A plunger-type injection system with an enlarged high-pressure reservoir was adopted to manage steady fuel injection pressures at 1200rpm. Each injection pressure condition was subject to a full-range exhaust gas dilution sweep into low-temperature combustion. The low sooting propensity of DME was apparent as engine-out soot emissions were below 2mg/kWh under all conditions. A higher injection pressure showed higher NOx emissions up to 70% EGR, thereafter NOx emissions persisted similarly low. A prominent improvement in combustion efficiency was observed from 325bar to 500bar followed by a minor improvement to 660bar. Correspondingly, exhaust gas speciation showed a similar trend in hydrogen, methane, and unburned DME emissions.</div></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".