MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388017378 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3328382

Flexible and Fine-Grained Access Control for EHR in Blockchain-Assisted E-Healthcare Systems

2023· article· en· W4388017378 on OpenAlexaff
Dajiang Chen, Li Zhang, Zeyu Liao, Hong‐Ning Dai, Xuemin Shen, Minghui Pang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceAccess controlSecurity tokenCiphertextData accessEncryptionPermissionComputer networkComputer securityDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is of the utmost importance to achieve flexible and fine-grained access control of electronic health records (EHR) in smart elderly healthcare (SEH) for providing high-quality healthcare services for the elderly and protecting their privacy simultaneously. In this paper, a flexible, fine-grained, and elderly-centric access control scheme is presented for EHR data in SEH. In the proposed scheme, Ciphertext Policy Attribute Based Encryption (CP-ABE), permission token, dual-key regression, and blockchain techniques are leveraged to realize multi-dimensional access control of EHR data in terms of data generation time, data user properties, access times, and access period. Moreover, a novel token segmentation algorithm is designed to transfer access rights between doctors efficiently for multi-party diagnosis and treatment. Since the elderly can define the attributes of users accessing his/her EHR data, the access number, the access time, and the access range of data from the time dimension of data generation with the cooperation of the Smart Elderly Healthcare (SEH) institution, the privacy of EHR data of the elderly is well protected. The security analysis demonstrates that our scheme can achieve EHR ciphertext indistinguishability under chosen-plaintext attacks and token unlinkability and unforgeability under data users’ collusion attacks. The experimental results show that our scheme performs well in terms of time cost and computational overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207