MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388017400 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2023.3327956

Flux Linkage Tracking-Based Permanent Magnet Temperature Hybrid Modeling and Estimation for PMSMs With Data-Driven-Based Core Loss Compensation

2023· article· en· W4388017400 on OpenAlexaff
Kaide Huang, Beichen Ding, Chunyan Lai, Guodong Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFlux linkageControl theory (sociology)MagnetCompensation (psychology)Linkage (software)Core (optical fiber)Computer scienceEngineeringControl engineeringMechanical engineeringDirect torque control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) drive, accurate magnet temperature is critical. The popular model-based magnet temperature estimation can be affected by core loss effect especially in the high-speed conditions. This article proposes a novel hybrid approach for accurate magnet temperature modeling and estimation, in which the estimation model is established by tracking the flux linkage variation, while the data-driven-based model is proposed to compensate the core loss effect. Specifically, the flux linkages in the rotating frame are projected into a new frame to derive the estimation model establishing the relationship between flux linkage variation and magnet temperature, in which the inverter distortion effect is canceled to improve the model accuracy. Based on this estimation model, the core loss effect is modeled, which indicates that the core loss influence is highly nonlinear and dependent on operating conditions. Hence, a radial basis function-based network is employed to model and compensate the core loss effect, and the network training is derived from the proposed model. The proposed hybrid approach can effectively improve the estimation performance especially at the high-speed conditions. Extensive experiments and comparisons are conducted on a laboratory interior PMSM drive to evaluate the proposed approach under various operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207