Long term stability of lactate in uncentrifuged sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate blood collection tubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed time from collection to centrifugation may cause erroneously high lactate levels in vitro (from continued blood cell metabolism under anaerobic conditions in the collection tube) if not collected in appropriate collection devices, consequently increasing the risk for inappropriate patient care or harm. We undertook a study to determine the turnaround time for lactate testing in a tertiary care setting and also performed short- and long-term lactate stability studies in blood collected in sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate (NaF/KOx) collection tubes. METHODS: The hospital lab information system was mined for 6 months to determine patient samples that may have exceeded the time from collection-to-receival in lab of 15-min. Lactate stability was evaluated in unspun NaF/KOx collection tubes at 15 min intervals for to 2 h; and separately at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48-h post-collection. RESULTS: A total of 8,929 plasma samples were collected in 6 months, and 1/3 were not received in the lab within 15 min from collection. In NaF/KOx additive, lactate levels had minor increases over 2 h, and incremental increases at an average rate of 0.0035 mmol/L/h over 48 h with maximum increase of 9.8% at 48 h. However, the average change across all time points were within local allowable performance goals (at ≤4 mmol/L ± 0.5 mmol/L; at >4 mmol/L ± 12%). CONCLUSION: A small proportion of lactate specimens may experience delay in processing. Although lactate levels may incrementally increase over 48-h at room temperature in unspun NaF/KOx collection tubes, the changes may not be clinically impactful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".