Pengaruh Identitas Diri dan Dukungan Sosial Keluarga terhadap Quarter Life Crisis Pada Mahasiswa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is an emotional crisis experienced by individuals during their transition period to show theirself-existence and responsibility in completing various tasks and challenges, which gives rise to strong negativefeelings of worry about the future life. This research aims to determine the influence of self-identity and familysocial support on the quarter life crisis in 2020 Faculty of Economics students at Djuanda University, Bogor. Thisresearch uses quantitative methods. The population in this study amounted to 178 samples with a total of 122respondents using the quota sampling technique. The results of the research analysis show that there is asignificant influence in the positive direction between self-identity and the quarter life crisis with an R value of0.504, R2 of 0.254 and Bx1y of 1.063 with p (0.001) < 0.05. Meanwhile, there is a significant influence in thenegative direction between family social support on the quarter life crisis R with an R value of 0.299, R2 of 0.089and Bx1y of -0.482 with p (0.001) < 0.05. The results of data analysis using Multiple Linear Regression usingSPSS 29.0 for Windows obtained an R value of 0.517, R2 of 0.268 and Bx1y of 0.201 with p (0.001) < 0.05.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".