Pengaruh Identitas Diri dan Dukungan Sosial Keluarga terhadap Quarter Life Crisis Pada Mahasiswa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is an emotional crisis experienced by individuals during their transition period to show theirself-existence and responsibility in completing various tasks and challenges, which gives rise to strong negativefeelings of worry about the future life. This research aims to determine the influence of self-identity and familysocial support on the quarter life crisis in 2020 Faculty of Economics students at Djuanda University, Bogor. Thisresearch uses quantitative methods. The population in this study amounted to 178 samples with a total of 122respondents using the quota sampling technique. The results of the research analysis show that there is asignificant influence in the positive direction between self-identity and the quarter life crisis with an R value of0.504, R2 of 0.254 and Bx1y of 1.063 with p (0.001) < 0.05. Meanwhile, there is a significant influence in thenegative direction between family social support on the quarter life crisis R with an R value of 0.299, R2 of 0.089and Bx1y of -0.482 with p (0.001) < 0.05. The results of data analysis using Multiple Linear Regression usingSPSS 29.0 for Windows obtained an R value of 0.517, R2 of 0.268 and Bx1y of 0.201 with p (0.001) < 0.05.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it