MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388026005 · doi:10.18174/630116

KD-2022-064 Cost benefit analysis landing obligation exemption plaice and sole in the BT2 segment

2023· report· en· W4388026005 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Tiano, A. Klok, Iago Mosqueira, J.A.E. van Oostenbrugge, Katell G. Hamon, Jurgen Batsleer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersMinisterie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
KeywordsDiscardsEuropean commissionFisheryObligationEnvironmental scienceGeographyBusinessBiologyEuropean unionInternational tradeFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exemptions under the landing obligation (LO) for undersized plaice and sole in the 80 mm beam trawl fishery expire in 2023. The European Commission has indicated that new scientific substantiation is needed to maintain the exemption. Here we evaluate the conservation strategies of adjusting the minimum conservation reference size ("MCRS”, currently 27 cm for plaice and 24 cm for sole) to 25 cm for both species and increasing the mesh size from 80 to 90 mm. This study analyzes data on annual landings and discard estimates from 2019 to 2021 and uses computational simulations to assess the potential effects of changing MCRS and mesh sizes on discards, landings, catches and the economic consequences. Our results show that a 25 cm MCRS for plaice could decrease discarding by 13 to 18% while increasing landings by 28 to 34%. A MCRS increase to 25 cm for sole was predicted to increase discards by 10 to 24% while reducing landings by 5 to 9%. Increasing the mesh size to 90 mm reduced total catches for both species (16% and 25% for plaice and sole, respectively) and largely negated changes caused by MCRS. Both species exhibited decreased discards with the larger mesh size simulations (plaice: 10 – 48%; sole: 32 – 64%) with sole landings being reduced (8 – 25%). Increasing the mesh size versus a shift in MCRS may have a more prominent effect on the discards of sole and plaice, however, potential changes to landings must be considered as well when evaluating potential economic and environmental consequences. Economic analyses show that the change in MCRS for both sole and plaice in combination does have a small effect on total income for the main groups of vessels targeting these two species. The decrease in sole landings is almost completely compensated by the increased landings from plaice resulting in a total reduction of landings value of 2 and 0% for euro cutters and large beam trawlers respectively. The reduction in sole landings resulting from an increase in mesh size to 90 mm had an adverse effect on the landings value for both types of vessels and their economic performance. Total value of landings decreased by 9% for both euro cutters and large beam trawlers, causing lower or negative profitability. We assume that landings of other species would also be affected by the mesh size increase, though the analysis suggests a limited impact (5% reduction). It is evident that lower sole landings would continue to affect revenue in the ensuing years after increasing the mesh size. However, considering the degree of uncertainty surrounding the future costs and earnings of large beam trawlers and euro cutters, the economic consequences from reduced landings and the possibilities of the fishing fleet to cope with such changes remains unclear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→