Integrated Computational Biophysics approach for Drug Discovery against Nipah Virus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Nipah virus (NiV) poses a pressing global threat to public health due to its high mortality rate, multiple modes of transmission, and lack of effective treatments. NiV glycoprotein G (NiV-G) emerges as a promising target for NiV drug discovery due to its essential role in viral entry and membrane fusion. Therefore, in this study we applied an integrated computational and biophysics approach to identify potential inhibitors of NiV-G within a curated dataset of Peruvian phytochemicals. Our virtual screening results indicated that these compounds could represent a natural source of potential NiV-G inhibitors with ∆G values ranging from -8 to -11 kcal/mol. Among them, Procyanidin B2, B3, B7, and C1 exhibited the highest binding affinities and formed the most molecular interactions with NiV-G. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed the induced-fit mechanism of NiV-G pocket interaction with these procyanidins, primarily driven by its hydrophobic nature. Non-equilibrium free energy calculations were employed to determine binding affinities, highlighting Procyanidin B3 and B2 as the ligands with the most substantial interactions. Overall, this work underscores the potential of Peruvian phytochemicals, particularly procyanidins B2, B3, B7, and C1, as lead compounds for developing anti-NiV drugs through an integrated computational biophysics approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".