MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DRJLRA: A Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Joint Load and Resource Allocation in Heterogeneous Coded Distributed Computing

2023· article· en· W4388040445 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Reza Heidarpour, Maryam Haghighi Ardakani, Masoud Ardakani, Chintha Tellambura

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReinforcement Learning in Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Innovates
KeywordsComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)Reinforcement learningDistributed computingComputationTask (project management)Set (abstract data type)Resource allocationResource management (computing)Scheme (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce the DRJLRA algorithm, a load and resource allocation scheme based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) for a generic multi-master, multi-worker coded distributed computing (CDC) system. Our aim is to minimize the combined delay of communication and computation for a set of matrix-vector multiplication tasks. The proposed DRL-based approach has several unique features that set it apart from existing literature. Firstly, it is applicable to general CDC systems with multiple masters and workers. Additionally, it considers multi-task CDC systems with stochastic task arrivals, takes into account the heterogeneity of workers with random computation and communication delays, and utilizes the state-of-the-art soft actor-critic (SAC) DRL algorithm, making it versatile and efficient in handling complex and dynamic CDC environments. Our results demonstrate that DRJLRA outperforms benchmark schemes significantly. It is thus well-suited for real-world CDC systems with diverse and dynamic workloads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReinforcement Learning in RoboticsFrench-language works237,207