A Study on the Sprinkler Installation Plan in the Air Conditioner Room through TRIZ Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last five years, there have been a total of 1,168 fires in outdoor air conditioners, half of which 49.4% occurred in residential facilities. Since 2006, the “Regulations on Housing Construction Standards, etc.” have been revised, and the Air conditioner room that has entered the indoor space is operated without opening the louvers sufficiently in a small space, or dust and moisture accumulate in a poorly ventilated state due to loading a large amount of goods, and if the air conditioner is operated for a long time due to a heat waves, the outdoor unit overheats, increasing the risk of fire. The study investigated the cases of the sprinkler installation in the Air conditioner room by type, and analyzed the three causes of fire suppression failure of the sprinkler in the event of a fire: ignition source, combustible material, and head operation failure, and analyzed using TRIZ technique. In order not to fail to extinguish the fire, An additional head should be installed. Water radiated from Upper head cools the thermal part of Lower head when installed in combination with the Upper and lower head, and the Lower head does not work. When the upper head is operated, the lower head can also be operated, and the fire suppression effect was demonstrated through a fire test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".